California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Hamel, G052068 (Cal. App. 2017):
Miranda requires officers to admonish suspects in police custody of certain rights, including the right to remain silent, to safeguard the Fifth Amendment's guarantee against self-incrimination. (See Miranda, supra, 384 U.S. at pp. 473-474 [suspect also must be advised of right to an attorney and that statements can be used against her in court].) These warnings are designed to "compensate for the coercive pressures inherent in a custodial interview." (Pilster, supra, 138 Cal.App.4th at p. 1405.) The prosecution may not use in its case-in-chief statements elicited during custodial interrogations unless
Page 15
preceded by a valid waiver of the defendant's Miranda rights. (People v. Mickey (1991) 54 Cal.3d 612, 647-648.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.