The following excerpt is from Singh v. Barr, 17-2977 NAC (2nd Cir. 2020):
inconsistent with his medical report regarding his injuries, that there were discrepancies between his testimony and application regarding who accompanied him to the police station, and that his demeanor undermined his credibility. See Norton v. Sam's Club, 145 F.3d 114, 117 (2d Cir. 1998) ("Issues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.").
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.