California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from McCoy v. Raheel, B240553 (Cal. App. 2013):
Plaintiffs' challenge to the orders awarding defendants their attorney fees after prevailing on their respective anti-SLAPP motions is based solely on the argument that the anti-SLAPP motions were improperly granted. Defendants are entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred in connection with their respective anti-SLAPP motions. ( 425.16, subd. (c).) Plaintiffs have failed to establish any abuse of discretion by the trial court in awarding such fees and costs. (Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1130.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.