Is a person who aids and abets criminal conduct a principal in any crime committed?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Fields, C068047 (Cal. App. 2014):

whether they directly commit the act constituting the offense, or aid and abet in its commission . . . are principals in any crime so committed." An aider and abettor is one who acts with knowledge of the criminal purpose of the perpetrator and with an intent or purpose either of committing, or of encouraging or facilitating commission of, the offense. (People v. Beeman (1984) 35 Cal.3d 547, 560.)

A person who knowingly aids and abets criminal conduct is guilty of not only the target offense, but also of any other crime the perpetrator actually commits that is the natural and probable consequence of the target offense. (People v. Medina (2009) 46 Cal.4th 913, 920 (Medina).) For example, if a person aids and abets only an intended assault, but a murder results, that person may be guilty of that murder, even if unintended, under the natural and probable consequence doctrine. (McCoy, supra, 25 Cal.4th at p. 1117.)

Other Questions


Is a person who knowingly aids and abets criminal conduct guilty of not only the intended crime but also of any other crime the perpetrator actually commits when they commit? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant who knowingly aids and abets criminal conduct guilty of not only the intended crime but also of any other crime the perpetrator actually commits as a result of the crime? (California, United States of America)
If a criminal commits a crime in a different county than the one where the crime was committed, would that change the outcome of the criminal trial if the crime occurred in the other county? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Is a person who committed a crime "under an ignorance or mistake of fact which disproves any criminal intent" incapable of committing the crime? (California, United States of America)
When a police officer has an objective, reasonable, articulable suspicion a person has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime, can the officer briefly detain the person? (California, United States of America)
What is the natural and probable consequences of a crime committed by a person who knowingly aids and abets criminal conduct? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1)(1) of the California Criminal Code apply to a person convicted of a criminal street crime committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 26 exempt a person from criminal liability under section 26 of the California Criminal Code from a general intent crime if they committed the crime while unconscious? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.