Is a period of aberrant behavior an aggravation or mitigation factor in deciding whether to sentence a defendant to two consecutive prison terms?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Patterson, B250340 (Cal. App. 2014):

period of aberrant behavior. [] (b) Any circumstances in aggravation or mitigation may be considered in deciding whether to impose consecutive rather than concurrent sentences, except: [] (1) A fact used to impose the upper term; [] (2) A fact used to otherwise enhance the defendant's prison sentence; and [] (3) A fact that is an element of the crime may not be used to impose consecutive sentences." "[T]he trial court is entitled to look at the whole record in the case" (People v. Fulton (1979) 92 Cal.App.3d 972, 976), including "'attendant facts,' 'the surroundings at the commission of an act,' [and] 'practically everything which has a legitimate bearing' on the matter in issue." (People v. Guevara (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 86, 93.)

Other Questions


What factors will a judge consider when deciding whether to sentence a defendant to a consecutive or concurrent sentence for assault with intent to murder and assault against two victims? (California, United States of America)
What are the reasons for a sentencing court to sentence a defendant to two consecutive terms of consecutive sentences under section 654 of the Criminal Code? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's Special Instruction No. 3 required to inform the jury that it is free to select a sentence of life without parole even if the aggravating factors outweigh the mitigating factors? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
Does section 8.85 of the California Criminal Code, which instructed the jury to consider whether or not certain mitigating factors were present, unconstitutionally suggest that the absence of such factors amounted to aggravation? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether the absence of a mitigating factor constitutes an aggravating factor? (California, United States of America)
Does section 8.85 of the California Criminal Code, which instructed the jury to consider whether or not certain mitigating factors were present, unconstitutionally suggest that the absence of such factors amounted to aggravation? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's non-death sentence a mitigating factor in mitigation? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have to consider whether a defendant's evidence of intoxication in mitigation constitute aggravation or aggravation? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a trial court be required to identify a particular sentencing factor as an aggravating or mitigating factor? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.