California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from J. C. Peacock, Inc. v. Hasko, 184 Cal.App.2d 142, 7 Cal.Rptr. 490 (Cal. App. 1960):
'The next question is whether the defendant's motion to strike the first and second counts of the third amended complaint should be granted or denied. I am of the view that the doctrine enunciated in Steiner v. Rowley, 35 Cal.2d 713, 221 P.2d 9, is here controlling and hence that the plaintiff must be deemed to have elected to proceed on the contract count. Hence the motion to strike counts 1 and 2 is granted.'
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.