California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Shader v. The Superior Court Of Santa Clara County, H035572, Super. Ct. No. CV139573 (Cal. App. 2010):
A peremptory challenge to a judge is barred if the judge presided at an earlier hearing that involved "a determination of contested fact issues relating to the merits...." ( 170.6, subd. (a)(2).) However," '[m]ost pretrial motions are decided without a determination of contested facts related to the merits of the case.' [Citation.]" (Swift, supra, 172 Cal.App.4th at p. 883.) A motion for a continuance does not involve a determination of contested fact issues related to the merits of the case; therefore, a peremptory challenge under section 170.6 is not barred where the judge previously heard a motion for a continuance. (Los Angeles County Dept. of Pub. Social Services v. Superior Court (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 407, 417.)
Page 9
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.