Is a mistake of law a defense of ignorance of the law?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lebeck, H045329 (Cal. App. 2019):

"A mistake of law, in its strict sense, means ignorance that the penal law (of which one stands accused) prohibits one's conductand ignorance on this point 'is almost never a defense.' " (People v. Meneses (2008) 165 Cal. App.4th 1648, 1662-1663.) Thus, "[i]t is commonly said that ignorance of the law is no excuse." (People v. Zamani (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 854, 887.) "There are a number of circumstances, however, in

Page 11

which violation of a penal statute is premised on the violator's harboring a particular mental state with respect to the nonpenal legal status of a person, thing, or action. In such cases, the principle is 'firmly established that defendant is not guilty if the offense charged requires any special mental element, such as that the prohibited act be committed knowingly, fraudulently, corruptly, maliciously or wilfully, and this element of the crime was lacking because of some mistake of nonpenal law.' . . . Thus, a taxpayer may defend against a [tax fraud] charge on the basis, for example, that he mistakenly believed certain deductions were proper under the tax laws, but not on the basis that he was unaware it was a crime to lie on one's tax return." (People v. Hagen (1998) 19 Cal.4th 652, 660, fn. 4.) Courts also have permitted a "defense of ignorance of the law" in cases involving "prosecution under complex regulatory schemes that have the potential of snaring unwitting violators." (United States v. Fierros (9th Cir. 1982) 692 F.2d 1291, 1295 (Fierros).)

b. Mistake of Nonpenal Law

Other Questions


Is a mistake-of-fact defense defense defense harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a mistake of fact defense defense harmless? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for a defense counsel to pursue an innocence defense rather than a voluntary intoxication defense? (California, United States of America)
Is the statute of limitations defense a "favored or disfavored" defense? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defense counsel be required to rest his case without putting on a defense? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel argue that defense counsel failed to object to the foregoing procedure or request that written instructions be provided to the jury? (California, United States of America)
When will a trial court instruct the jury on the defense of unconsciousness and self-defense in a case of involuntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor have the authority to imply that defense counsel fabricated a defense? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.