The following excerpt is from United States v. King, 891 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2018):
King has not met his burden. He contends that because his revocation was based on a finding that he committed statutory rape, he may be forced in the future to register as a sex-offender, which could affect his ability to visit his own children. Although sex-offender registration is a collateral consequence of a criminal conviction for statutory rape, see, e.g. , Williamson v. Gregoire , 151 F.3d 1180, 118283 (9th Cir. 1998), King was not convicted of statutory rape. Rather, in a supervised release revocation proceeding, the district court found by a preponderance of the
[891 F.3d 871]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.