Is a jury instruction erroneous if it misleads the jury as to the correct legal standard?

MultiRegion, United States of America

The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Naiman, 211 F.3d 40 (2nd Cir. 1999):

L.Ed.2d 437 (1998). "A jury instruction is erroneous if it misleads the jury as to the correct legal standard or does not adequately inform the jury on the law." United States v. Walsh, 194 F.3d 37, 52 (2d Cir. 1999) (citation and quotation omitted). Reversal is required only if the instructions, viewed as a whole, caused the defendant prejudice. See id.

Other Questions


Is a jury instruction erroneous if it misleads the jury as to the correct legal standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a jury charge erroneous if it misleads the jury as to the correct legal standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal standard used by the courts to determine the correct legal standard? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a district court's decision whether or not to give an instruction of entrapment instruction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with the first instruction and second instruction in a motion to deny an instruction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal district court rely on an erroneous legal standard in its determination of whether or not to grant a preliminary injunction? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a court finds that a plaintiff has been denied a right to sue under a different legal standard than under the current standard of care, can the finding be reviewed? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the legal basis for an instruction that instructs a plaintiff not to cross the line in front of a jury? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the applicable standard of review and what is the standard of correctness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
In reviewing jury instructions, what is the test for determining whether the jury instructions as a whole are misleading or inadequate to guide deliberations? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.