The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Ware, 108 F.3d 340 (9th Cir. 1996):
A district court's denial of a motion for substitution of counsel and a trial continuance is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. United States v. George, 85 F.3d 1433, 1438 (9th Cir.1996); United States v. Gonzalez-Rincon, 36 F.3d 859, 865 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1323 (1995).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.