Is a failure to instruct on accomplice liability harmless?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Johnson, C076191, C076607 (Cal. App. 2020):

Failure to instruct on accomplice liability is harmless if there is sufficient corroborating evidence in the record. (People v. Lewis (2001) 26 Cal.4th 334, 370.) Corroborating evidence may be slight, may be entirely circumstantial, and need not be

Page 14

Other Questions


Is a court's failure to instruct on accomplice liability under section 1111 harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct on accomplice liability harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's failure to instruct on accomplice liability under section 1111 harmless? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to instruct on the elements of a second degree murder constitute a "failure to amplify or clarify the correct instruction"? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to give an accomplice instruction under section 1111 harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a trial court's failure to instruct on the law of accomplices harmless? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury find prejudice from a failure to give an aiding and abetting instruction when a defendant has been found guilty under instructions based on direct perpetrator liability? (California, United States of America)
What are the consequences of the Court's failure to instruct on an instructing on a harmless beyond a reasonable doubt finding? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct on accomplice testimony harmless? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury's failure to instruct the jury with a unanimity instruction harmless beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.