Is a failure to give the requested instructions on voluntary manslaughter a harmless error?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Brooks, 185 Cal.App.3d 687, 230 Cal.Rptr. 86 (Cal. App. 1986):

Therefore, the factual question posed by the omitted instruction was not necessarily resolved adversely to defendant under other, properly given instructions. (People v. Edwards, supra, 39 Cal.3d at pp. 116-117, 216 Cal.Rptr. 397, 702 P.2d 555.) That being so, it cannot be said that the failure to give the requested instructions on voluntary manslaughter was harmless error; thus, appellant's conviction for second degree murder must be reversed. (Ibid.)

"Although defendant's convictions cannot stand, it does not necessarily follow that the judgment must be unconditionally reversed. 'An appellate court is not restricted to the remedies of affirming or reversing a judgment. Where the prejudicial error goes only to the degree of the offense for which the defendant was convicted, the appellate court may reduce the conviction to a lesser degree and affirm the judgment as modified, thereby obviating the necessity for a retrial.' " (People v. Edwards, supra, 39 Cal.3d at p. 118, 216 Cal.Rptr. 397, 702 P.2d 555.)

The People, however, are entitled to try to obtain another conviction for second degree murder. The record contains sufficient evidence to justify the attempt. On the other hand, the prosecution may decide that it is satisfied with voluntary manslaughter. Therefore, our disposition preserves these two options. (See People v. Edwards, supra, 39 Cal.3d at p. 118, 216 Cal.Rptr. 397, 702 P.2d 555; People v. Garcia (1972) 27 Cal.App.3d 639, 647-648, 104 Cal.Rptr. 69.)

Other Questions


Is a defendant's failure to request additional instructions or request clarification of existing instructions a waiver of their right to complain of any omission on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Does a jury have a duty to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter and attempted voluntary manslaughter as lesser included offenses of murder and attempted murder? (California, United States of America)
What is the consequence of a defendant's failure to request an instruction on the type of voluntary manslaughter in a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
Is a failure to instruct on an instruction on attempted voluntary manslaughter prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant's objection to giving instructions on voluntary manslaughter preclude a finding of error in the trial court's failure to do so? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's argument that the court erred in failing to instruct on voluntary manslaughter constitute a harmless error? (California, United States of America)
Is it harmless error to decline to instruct the jury respecting factors not listed in the requested instruction? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's failure to instruct the jury that a killing in the heat of passion lacks malice and is at most voluntary manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
Is a jury's instruction on voluntary manslaughter sufficient to convict a defendant of manslaughter? (California, United States of America)
When faced with a prosecutor's comment that a defendant's refusal to testify may constitute a harmless error, is this harmless error? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.