The following excerpt is from Hammett v. Sherman, Case No.: 19-CV-605 JLS (AHG) (S.D. Cal. 2020):
Plaintiff responds that the policy considerations favoring derivative actions "do[] not apply to cases involving closely-held corporations." ECF No. 73-1 at 9 (citing Jara v. Suprema Meats, Inc., 121 Cal. App. 4th 1238, 1259 (2004)). Plaintiff also contends that her failure "to receive the distributions she was entitled to makes her a creditor under Corporations Code 17250." See id. at 11 (emphasis in original).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.