The following excerpt is from Kimball v. Commandant Twelfth Naval District, 423 F.2d 88 (9th Cir. 1970):
In the interests of avoiding uneconomical piecemeal appellate review, it has generally been held that appeal does not lie from the denial of an application for a temporary restraining order. (See e. g., Chandler v. Garrison, 394 F.2d 828 (5th Cir. 1967).) Nevertheless, under certain circumstances the denial of temporary or preliminary relief may decide the merits of a case. In such a situation nothing is gained by requiring an appellant to go through the motions of re-applying for permanent injunctive relief in the trial court. We think that this is such a case.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.