The following excerpt is from Knox v. Davis, 260 F.3d 1009 (9th Cir. 2001):
Id. at 238 (emphasis added). See also Hoesterey v. City of Cathedral City, 945 F.2d 317, 320 (9th Cir. 1991) (holding that "the simple notification that [plaintiff ] was being discharged at a later date would not be sufficient to trigger the statute of limitations period").10 So here, the simple notification that legal mail and visitation rights were being withdrawn would not be sufficient to trigger the statutory period on subsequent denials of constitutional rights.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.