Is a defendant who commits a violent crime against several victims more culpable than a violent offender who commits violent crimes against one person more than one?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Flores, B233196 (Cal. App. 2012):

A defendant who commits a violent crime against several victims is more culpable that a defendant who commits a violent crime against one person, regardless of his intent or objective. (Oates, supra, 32 Cal.4th at p. 1063.) The multiple victim exception promotes section 654's purpose that a defendant's punishment will be commensurate with his culpability. (Oates, at p. 1063.) Likewise, multiple enhancements ensure that a defendant will not be treated less severely because he chooses to rob several victims to benefit his gang rather than just one victim. (Cf. People v. King, supra, 5 Cal.4th at pp. 73-74.) We conclude that where there were multiple victims, each robbery conviction is subject to a gang enhancement.

Page 33

Other Questions


Is a person who aids or abets a crime liable for the crime if the original crime was committed independently by another person? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant who has not been convicted of a violent crime prior to his strike has been found to be a victim of a previous violent crime? (California, United States of America)
When a police officer has an objective, reasonable, articulable suspicion a person has committed a crime or is about to commit a crime, can the officer briefly detain the person? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury use uncharged crime evidence to determine that defendant was more likely to have committed the charged crimes because he committed the uncharged crimes? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant has committed a crime committed while an accomplice is also involved in the crime? (California, United States of America)
Does section 654 of the California Criminal Code apply to a defendant who has committed a crime before the crime has been committed? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a finding that a crime committed by appellant was committed with the specific intent to commit a crime against a specific gang member? (California, United States of America)
Can the actual killer be held liable as an accessory on the theory that he encouraged the murder victim to commit the crime after he had committed the crime? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant claiming self-defense to an assaultive crime present evidence of a victim's violent nature to show the victim was the aggressor? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.