Is a defendant's right to be free of adverse inferences from his failure to testify in a flight instruction?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Vargas, 126 Cal.Rptr. 88, 53 Cal.App.3d 516 (Cal. App. 1975):

14] Defendant asserts that the instruction violated the defendant's right to be free of adverse inferences from his failure to testify. Griffin v. California (1965), 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106, fails to distinguish between the defendant's privilege against self-incrimination which is protected under the Griffin rule, and his right, and normally exercised privilege, to be present at trial with counsel and confront the witness against him. The flight instruction only permitted an inference to be drawn from the defendant's failure to be physically present. The jury [53 Cal.App.3d 531] were expressly instructed not to consider or draw any inferences from his failure to testify. 5

Other Questions


Is a defendant's failure to testify at the penalty phase an error not to instruct the jury to refrain from drawing any inference from the fact that defendant did not testify at penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
When will a court grant a defendant an instruction that cautions the jury that it may not draw an adverse inference from the fact that a defendant has not testified at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for instructing a jury with the flight instruction where there is evidence of a defendant's flight? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to request additional instructions or request clarification of existing instructions a waiver of their right to complain of any omission on appeal? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's failure to propose any modification to a flight instruction forfeits a claim of instructional error? (California, United States of America)
What should the jury have been instructed not to draw any adverse inference from the fact that defendant did not testify at the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
Is there an undue "chilling effect" on the procedural rights of criminal defendants when the jury instructs a criminal defendant to testify before the jury that he will be cross-examined? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of a defendant's failure to bring a motion for a hearing on a Defendant's Miranda rights claim? (California, United States of America)
Is a waiver of a defendant's right to testify a personal waiver of that right? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant entitled to damages if the prosecutor improperly commented upon defendant's failure to testify? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.