California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Melgoza, G042751, Super. Ct. No. 07ZF0012 (Cal. App. 2011):
"Defendant did not request the clarifying language he now contends was crucial and may not now 'complain on appeal that an instruction correct in law and responsive to the evidence was too general or incomplete.' [Citations.] Defendant's failure to either object to the proposed instruction or request that the omitted language be given to the jury forfeits his claim on appeal. [Citation.]" (People v. Valdez (2004) 32 Cal.4th 73, 113.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.