California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Frye, 18 Cal.4th 894, 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 25, 959 P.2d 183 (Cal. 1998):
[18 Cal.4th 1024] We recently considered and rejected the identical claim in People v. Millwee, supra, 18 Cal.4th at pages 162-163, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 418, 954 P.2d 990, and cases cited therein. For the reasons succinctly stated in that opinion, defendant's contention is likewise rejected here.
In a footnote and with little elaboration, defendant next contends that the trial court erred in refusing defense counsel's request for an instruction identifying for the jury which factors were mitigating. We have consistently rejected this contention on the basis that whether a factor is aggravating or mitigating is readily apparent without such labels. (People v. Millwee, supra, 18 Cal.4th at pp. 163-164, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 418, 954 P.2d 990.) Defendant offers no persuasive argument to the contrary.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.