Is a defendant's contention that the trial court erred in denying defense counsel's request for an instruction identifying mitigating factors?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Frye, 18 Cal.4th 894, 77 Cal.Rptr.2d 25, 959 P.2d 183 (Cal. 1998):

[18 Cal.4th 1024] We recently considered and rejected the identical claim in People v. Millwee, supra, 18 Cal.4th at pages 162-163, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 418, 954 P.2d 990, and cases cited therein. For the reasons succinctly stated in that opinion, defendant's contention is likewise rejected here.

In a footnote and with little elaboration, defendant next contends that the trial court erred in refusing defense counsel's request for an instruction identifying for the jury which factors were mitigating. We have consistently rejected this contention on the basis that whether a factor is aggravating or mitigating is readily apparent without such labels. (People v. Millwee, supra, 18 Cal.4th at pp. 163-164, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 418, 954 P.2d 990.) Defendant offers no persuasive argument to the contrary.

Other Questions


Does the trial court erred by discussing some of defendant's complaints about defense counsel and disagreements with defense counsel in the presence of the prosecutor? (California, United States of America)
Does trial counsel shirk his constitutional responsibility to provide competent counsel by failing to ask the court to instruct on a bogus self-defense defense? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court erred when it denied his request to instruct the jury it could reject the death penalty if it had a lingering doubt about his guilt? (California, United States of America)
Can defense counsel request further instructions to instruct the jury that the absence of mitigation is not an aggravating factor? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the court should have deleted reference to irrelevant mitigating factors from the instructions given to the jury regarding the aggravating and mitigating factors to be considered in determining the appropriate penalty? (California, United States of America)
When there is no substantial evidence to warrant a self-defense instruction, does McNeely's contention that counsel's failure to request the instruction constitute ineffective assistance of counsel? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court require a defense counsel to object to a motion where the trial atmosphere was poisonous, and the defense counsel did not object at all? (California, United States of America)
How have we dealt with the Attorney General's contention that a defendant forfeited any claim of error by failing to object or request modification to an instruction in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any grounds to argue that the trial court erred in failing to give the cautionary instruction at the end of trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.