Is a defendant's claim that he was coerced into giving evidence in a second interview by police officers that he had been threatened with the death penalty?

Defendant nonetheless urges that the officers coerced his statements when, during the first interview, they threatened he would suffer the death penalty unless he cooperated with them. "Of course, '[a] [c]onfession induced by the threats of prosecution for a capital crime [has] been held inadmissible.' " (People v. Avena (1996) 13 Cal.4th 394, 420.) As defendant claims, and as demonstrated by the

Page 42

italicized language, ante, at pages 34-36, there were several references to the death penalty during the first interrogation.