California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Woodruff, 235 Cal.Rptr.3d 513, 421 P.3d 588, 5 Cal.5th 697 (Cal. 2018):
to let you know that." Defendant contends this was misconduct because it was an "appeal[ ] to the jurors uninformed stereotypes of what mentally retarded people look like." Because he did not object, he has forfeited the contention on appeal. ( People v. Rices, supra, 4 Cal.5th at p. 80, 226 Cal.Rptr.3d 118, 406 P.3d 788.) Recognizing this, defendant also contends his attorney was ineffective in failing to object. We disagree.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.