Is a defendant entitled to an argumentative instruction that pinpoints the defense theory of the case?

A defendant is entitled to an instruction that pinpoints the defense theory of the case. (People v. Wright (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1126, 1137.) A defendant is not entitled to an argumentative instruction that " 'select[s] certain material facts, or those which are deemed to be material, and endeavor[s] to force the court to indicate an opinion favorable to the defendant as to the effect of such facts, by incorporating them into instructions containing a correct principle of law.' . . . 'An instruction should contain a principle of law applicable to the case, expressed in plain language, indicating no opinion of the court as to any fact in issue.' " (Id. at p. 1135.)