The following excerpt is from United States v. Martinez, CR. NO. 2:09-224 WBS (E.D. Cal. 2016):
2011); see also United States v. Mullanix, 99 F.3d 323, 324 (9th Cir. 1996) (holding that "the mandatory minimum was not affected by the change in the [drug] equivalency tables" and, thus, "the district court had no authority to reduce [the defendant's] sentence under 3582(c)(2)"). Accordingly, because defendant does not qualify for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), the court must deny his motion.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.