The following excerpt is from United States v. Pugh, 937 F.3d 108 (2nd Cir. 2019):
and procedurally unreasonable because the court did not provide him with the opportunity to give his prepared sentencing remarks and did not give adequate reasoning for imposing the maximum permissible sentence. We review sentencing decisions under a "deferential abuse-of-discretion standard of review." Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 52, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).
a. Right of Allocution
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.