The following excerpt is from Black v. Leavitt (In re Black), 609 B.R. 518 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2019):
Finally, he argued that, under McDonald v. Burgie (In re Burgie) , 239 B.R. 406 (9th Cir. BAP 1999), the sale proceeds were not disposable income that he must commit to the plan, and he cannot be compelled to use the proceeds of the postpetition sale of prepetition real estate to pay creditors under a chapter 13 plan.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.