Is a convicted rapist who commits multiple, heinous crimes resulting in a de facto life sentence not cruel and unusual punishment?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Carranza, G055902 (Cal. App. 2019):
The fact that a person commits multiple, heinous crimes resulting in a de facto life sentence does not by itself implicate constitutional concerns. For instance, a prison sentence exceeding 283 years, nearly twice as long as the sentence at issue here, for multiple rape and other sexual offenses was not cruel and unusual punishment in People v. Wallace (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 651, 666.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does a defendant who committed a crime under a different sentencing scheme that existed at the time he committed the crime be sentenced to a different sentence? (California, United States of America)
Can a convicted felon who has completed his or her sentence for a crime reduced to a misdemeanor by Proposition 47, after the crime has been committed, apply to have the conviction designated as a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Does a lengthy sentence for multiple sex crimes constitute cruel or unusual punishment? (California, United States of America)
If section 654 of the Criminal Code prohibits multiple punishment, can the trial court stay execution of the sentence on the convictions for which multiple punishment is prohibited? (California, United States of America)
Does a statute retroactively increase the punishment for a crime committed after the crime has been committed violate the ex post facto clause? (California, United States of America)
Can a court correct an error that resulted in a sentence being issued to a defendant who was convicted of a lesser crime but who is convicted of the lesser crime of assault? (California, United States of America)
Can a convicted felon who has completed his sentence for a conviction for a crime committed under Proposition 47, who would have been guilty of a misdemeanor under the same legislation, apply to have the conviction reduced to a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 654 of the California Criminal Code bar multiple sex offenders from receiving multiple punishment for multiple sex crimes committed during a single course of conduct? (California, United States of America)
When a convicted criminal has completed his sentence for a conviction for a crime committed under section 1170.18, subdivision (f) of the California Criminal Code, can the conviction be reduced to a misdemeanor? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant has been convicted of multiple violent sex crimes as defined in section 667.61, subdivision (i) of the California Criminal Code, what is the appropriate sentence for each sex crime committed on separate occasions? (California, United States of America)
