Similarly, when interpreting a waiver, the text is not necessarily determinative. This issue was discussed by Justice Reed in Stanley J. Solberg v. M.N.R., 92 D.T.C. 6448 (F.C.T.D.) whose reasoning was followed in Fagan v. The Queen, 2011 TCC 523. In Fagan, Justice Angers emphasized that extrinsic evidence is often relevant when interpreting a waiver. See paragraphs [34] and [35]. Scope of the Waiver:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.