What the Court of Appeal was concerned with in the Virani decisions was jurisdictional or territorial overreaching. Such overreaching does not comport with international comity. As La Forest J. wrote for the majority in Tolofson v. Jensen, 1994 CanLII 44 (SCC), [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022 at 1047: The underlying postulate of public international law is that generally each state has jurisdiction to make and apply law within its territorial limit. Absent a breach of some overriding norm, other states as a matter of "comity" will ordinarily respect such actions and are hesitant to interfere with what another state chooses to do within those limits…These are the realities that must be reflected and accommodated in private international law.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.