Often in these cases, “best interest” is determined by maintaining the status quo. The status quo is particularly important in an interim motion because the court is often not able to make factual findings if there are, as in this case, conflicting affidavits: Pancel v. Henri, 2012 ONSC 546, at paras. 25 and 26. McPhail v. McPhail, 2018 ONSC 735, at para. 15.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.