Intent, in this context, is not synonymous with “desired end” or “objective”. In Neville v. Brace (1978), 28 N.S.R. (2d) 387; CarswellNS 157 (N.S.S.C.) Hallett J., as he then was, said: ¶50 The intention that must be proven to cause loss or damage need not be that the wrongdoer intended to cause the specific loss or damage that in fact occurred, but a general intention to cause loss or damage. The intention can be inferred from the conduct of the wrongdoer; . . .
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.