In Dane v. Mortgage Insurance Corporation, Limited, supra, by an instrument purporting to be a “policy of insurance”, the defendants guaranteed to the plaintiff payment of a sum of money deposited by her in a bank if the bank defaulted in paying the same. The bank made default in payment of the sum deposited. Subsequently, a scheme of arrangement, to which the plaintiff was not a party and to which she did not consent, was entered into between the bank, its creditors and the colonial court under the provisions of a colonial statute. Notwithstanding the scheme of arrangement, it was held that the contract: the policy of insurance, was upon its true construction, one of insurance against a certain event, viz., the bank’s default, and, that event having happened, the defendant was liable to pay the sum insured.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.