The plaintiff says that he wants an injunction because the pipe has been plugged in such a manner that it might easily be re-opened. This is not a sufficient reason for an injunction. Although the injunction is refused, the defendants remain under the obligation so to construct and maintain their public works as not to invade the rights of the plaintiff or of other property-owners: Rowe v. Rochester, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.