In India v. Singh, [1996] B.C.J. No. 2792 (S.C.), the court appears to have admitted a report of an Indian government inquiry into torture allegations into evidence under the public document exception. It did so without any analysis of the rule and in my respectful view it was clearly wrongly decided. In those circumstances I need not follow it: McCready v. Nanaimo (City), 2005 BCSC 762 at paras. 46-47, 46 B.C.L.R. (4th) 331.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.