What is the test for imputing an income for the respondent based on assets received by the respondent?
New Brunswick, Canada
The following excerpt is from Basque v Basque, 2016 NBQB 237 (CanLII):
This argument is redundant considering that the respondent has withdrawn her application for retroactive support and that this case involves only a prospective calculation. An income should be imputed to the respondent based on the assets she received, as in Campbell v. Vaughn
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is the petitioner entitled to benefit from the increased income of the respondent post-separation? (New Brunswick, Canada)
In what circumstances will a spouse not receive spousal support from her husband's increased income? (New Brunswick, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court impute income for the purposes of determining child support? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can a plaintiff make a claim for loss of future income based on their intention to pursue a nursing career? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Can a father benefit from a retroactive reduction of child support arrears based on reduced income in the years 2016- 2018? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is a plaintiff's claim for bad faith rejection of insurance benefits a tort/contract based tort or contract based claim? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the effect of a husband going bankrupt on his wife's assets? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the difference between a salary recommendation based on a percentage or ratio of the salary level of another court? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is a verdict under appeal based on credibility or not? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is a Respondent's duty to produce admissible evidence in a motion for summary judgment? (New Brunswick, Canada)
