California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gonzales, B257042 (Cal. App. 2016):
As for the comments made in front of the jury, there is no indication that the "harsh rebuke of counsel" signaled anything to the jurors. The trial court did not commit misconduct simply by expressing irritation with counsel or admonishing counsel in the jury's presence. (People v. Carpenter, supra, 15 Cal.4th at p. 353.) As for the comments made after the jury was dismissed from the courtroom, there was no prejudice as the jurors were not present. (People v. Guerra, supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 1112.) In any event, we agree with the People that this exchange demonstrates that defense counsel was "extremely contentious and disrespectful, and her behavior was highly inappropriate."
Page 16
c. alleged bias that affected the disposition of issues
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.