In what circumstances will the prosecutor ask the defense to present their case-in-chief before presenting its rebuttal?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Roberts, F071777 (Cal. App. 2018):
In any event, we perceive no misconduct. Although the usual order of proof calls for the prosecution's rebuttal to follow presentation of the defense's case-in-chief ( 1093, subds. (c) & (d)), departing from that order lies within a trial court's discretion (People v. Seastone (1969) 3 Cal.App.3d 60, 67; People v. Mayfield (1961) 196 Cal.App.2d 72, 75; Evid. Code, 320). As for the prosecutor's method of questioning,
Page 32
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a prosecutor criticizes a defense attorney's conduct at trial, can the prosecutor be found guilty of misconduct if the prosecutor's arguments are not in the context of the defense counsel's conduct? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the defense forfeited any challenge to the prosecutor's joke about defense experts who adjust their testimony to the needs of their client? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, in what circumstances would the jury have considered a defense counsel's closing argument that the prosecutor's rebuttal to the closing argument had the trial court sustained an objection? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the defense argue that the prosecutor improperly shifted the burden of proof to the defense? (California, United States of America)
Is a prosecutor's comment that defense counsel was seeking to "distract the jury from the evidence as an attack on counsel's integrity a fair response to defense counsel's remarks? (California, United States of America)
Is there any limitation on defense counsel's argument that the jury should consider whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances? (California, United States of America)
Is there any limitation on defense counsel's argument that the jury should consider whether the aggravating circumstances outweigh the mitigating circumstances? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defense counsel be required to rest his case without putting on a defense? (California, United States of America)
When a prosecutor asks a defense counsel a question in voir dire about rape and sexual assault, is the defense counsel's failure to object to the questions? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor have the authority to imply that defense counsel fabricated a defense? (California, United States of America)
