In what circumstances will the Court review the facts supporting defendant's conviction for assault?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Martinez, B281480 (Cal. App. 2018):
In accord with the usual rules of appellate review, we state the facts supporting defendant's conviction in a manner most favorable to the judgment. (People v. Ochoa (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1199, 1206.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a motion for review of a conviction for assault and robbery, in what circumstances will the Court uphold the conviction of defendant as a result of insufficient evidence to support the judgment? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Court review the facts supporting defendant's conviction for assault? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant claims the trial court made an impermissible dual use of a fact to support both an enhancement and an aggravating factor in his conviction for assault, what is the test for determining whether the sentence should be increased or reduced? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for sexual assault, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the court impose a lesser sentence on a defendant who was convicted of assault with intent to murder and possession of an assault weapon, but who also has firearms enhancements? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who has a history of criminal convictions for assault, assault and sexual assault receive a conditional discharge from the Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction of a convicted rapist, does the court have to review the evidence in the context of section 1118.1? (California, United States of America)
When a criminal defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, how does the Court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support the conviction, how does the court review the evidence? (California, United States of America)
In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, what is the test for a jury to convict a defendant of sexual assault? (California, United States of America)
