In what circumstances will the court reverse determinations by the trial court concerning the credibility of witnesses?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Langley v. Penske Motor Grp., LLC, B275610 (Cal. App. 2017):
These were determinations by the trial court concerning the credibility of witnesses. We do not reverse such determinations unless they are not supported by substantial evidence. Rather, we interpret the facts in the light most favorable to the party prevailing below and indulge in all reasonable inferences in support of the trial court's order. (Shoemaker v. County of Los Angeles (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 618, 625.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
On a motion to suppress, can the trial court determine the credibility of the witness? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant challenges on appeal a motion for a new trial on grounds of juror misconduct, does he accept the credibility determinations and findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have courts reversed a judgment entered in a criminal case following a court trial? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Is there a duty of the court to protect the credibility of a witness from cross-examination questions that "harass, annoy or humiliate the witness's credibility"? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
