The following excerpt is from United States v. Young, No. 12-1054(CON), No. 12-1328(CON), No. 12-513(L) (2nd Cir. 2014):
The same conclusion obtains for Chambliss's challenge to prosecution arguments concerning cooperating witnesses' motives to tell the truth. In response to defense attacks on these witnesses' credibility, the prosecutor was entitled to argue that they had a strong motive to tell the truth because false testimony would subject them to adverse consequences under their cooperation agreements. See United States v. Carr, 424 F.3d 213, 228 (2d Cir. 2005).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.