California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Lorenzana v. Superior Court, 108 Cal.Rptr. 585, 511 P.2d 33, 9 Cal.3d 626 (Cal. 1973):
In People v. Berutko, 71 Cal.2d 84, 91, 77 Cal.Rptr. 217, 220, 453 P.2d 721, 724, wherein an officer, from the vantage point of a common area adjacent to the defendant's apartment, looked into that apartment through an aperture in the drapes, which
Page 600
[9 Cal.3d 647] It was similarly held in People v. Guerra, 21 Cal.App.3d 534, 537--538, 98 Cal.Rptr. 627, that the conduct of an officer in eavesdropping by placing his ear to the door of defendant's apartment in the area of the hinges and possibly the peephole did not violate the defendant's 'constitutional right to privacy.'
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.