California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Martin v. Kehl, 145 Cal.App.3d 228, 193 Cal.Rptr. 312 (Cal. App. 1983):
2 Hamud v. Hawthorne (1959) 52 Cal.2d 78, 338 P.2d 387, cited by defendant, is inapposite. In Hamud, unlike here, the plaintiff received fair value for consenting to defendant's possession and only sued years later after the value had increased because an oil company had expressed interest in it.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.