California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. McDaniel, S171393 (Cal. 2021):
In People v. Prieto (2003) 30 Cal.4th 226, we further explained that because the penalty jury merely weighs the factors enumerated in section 190.3 and determines whether a defendant eligible for the death penalty should in fact receive that sentence...' [citation] [n]o single factor therefore determines which penalty - death or life without the possibility of parole - is appropriate. []... [And] [b]ecause any finding of aggravating factors during the penalty phase does not increase[ ] the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum' [citation], Ring imposes no new constitutional requirements on California's penalty phase proceedings. (Id. at p. 263.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.