In what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of a general intent crime for failing to provide authority for his contention?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Nutting, C076803 (Cal. App. 2016):
As with other contentions, defendant's opening brief provides no authority for his contention. Once again, he cites Civil Code section 1912, but he cites no statute or case concerning scienter requirements or general intent crimes. Failure to provide authority forfeits the contention. (See People v. Stanley (1995) 10 Cal.4th 764, 793.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a defendant admits committing a crime but denies the necessary intent for the charged crime because of mistake or accident, is intent to commit the crime admissible? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of an assault with intent to kill if a police officer was on duty at the scene of the shooting? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant plead guilty to a crime charged or to any other crime under California Evidence Code section 1153.4? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of a special circumstance charge under Section 187 of the Penal Code? (California, United States of America)
Under what circumstances will a defendant be found guilty of perverting the course of justice by failing to explain or deny evidence against him? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Attorney General claim that the Defendant failed to object to the Defendant's conduct at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a valid claim to be able to claim damages from a defendant who has been found guilty of a similar claim against the Defendant? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant harbored the intent to kill at the outset, and committed the same crime at the start of the crime, will the special circumstance apply? (California, United States of America)
If a defendant harbored the intent to kill at the outset, and committed the same crime at the start of the crime, will the special circumstance apply? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law in which a defendant has been found guilty of failing to provide adequate grounds for prosecution? (California, United States of America)
