California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Tanner, H043558 (Cal. App. 2018):
The state has a " 'weighty interest in the finality of judgments in criminal cases' " and thus there are rules limiting a defendant's ability to collaterally attack a conviction or sentence. (Gomez v. Superior Court (2012) 54 Cal.4th 293, 309.) For example, procedural rules barring successive habeas corpus petitions " 'are necessary both to deter use of the writ to unjustifiably delay implementation of the law, and to avoid the need to set aside final judgments of conviction when retrial would be difficult or impossible.' " (Id. at p. 308.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.