California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Andalon v. Superior Court, 162 Cal.App.3d 600, 208 Cal.Rptr. 899 (Cal. App. 1984):
I conform my concurrence to the reasoning and conclusion reached in Turpin v. Sortini (1982) 31 Cal.3d 220, 182 Cal.Rptr. 337, 643 P.2d 954. That court succinctly summarized the extent to which such an action may be pursued and ultimately compensated in damages. "In sum, we conclude that while a plaintiff-child in a wrongful life action may not recover general damages for being born impaired as opposed to not being born at all, the child--like his or her parents--may recover special damages for the extraordinary expenses necessary to treat the hereditary ailment." (Id., at p. 239, 182 Cal.Rptr. 337, 643 P.2d 954.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.