In the case of indivisible injury caused by multiple tortfeasors, the tortfeasors are jointly and severally liable regardless of whether the torts were concurrent or consecutive. In Ashcroft v. Dhaliwal, 2008 BCCA 352, leave to appeal ref’d [2008] S.C.C.A. No. 488 [Ashcroft], Huddart J.A. wrote at para. 2, “there is no valid policy reason for treating concurrent and consecutive torts differently when both are necessary causes of an indivisible injury and its consequential losses”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.