It is especially unlikely that an insurer would overpay its insured in Section D cases, because of the doubtful prospect of any recovery from the defaulting third party (see for example, Somersall v. Friedman, 2002 SCC 59, para. 71). This circumstance is additional incentive for an insurer to pay no more than it must – i.e. no more than would be reasonable. As well, in limits cases where coverage is almost always exceeded, settlement at the insurance limit is further assurance that the settlement amount is reasonable. All these factors favour the reasonableness of settlement in such cases.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.