California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Wheeler, B275786 (Cal. App. 2017):
In reviewing a claim of judicial bias or misconduct, " ' "[o]ur role . . . is not to determine whether the trial judge's conduct left something to be desired, or even whether some comments would have been better left unsaid. Rather, we must determine whether the judge's behavior was so prejudicial that it denied [the defendant] a fair, as opposed to a perfect, trial." ' [Citation.] We make that determination on a case-by-case basis, examining the context of the court's comments and the circumstances under which they occurred. [Citation.] Thus, the propriety and prejudicial effect of a particular comment are judged by both its content and the circumstances surrounding it." (People v. Abel (2012) 53 Cal.4th 891, 914.)
Page 13
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.