The following excerpt is from Southern Pac. R. Co. v. Doyle, 11 F. 253 (U.S. Cir. Ct., D. Cal. 1882):
The case of Ellis v. Patterson, in this court, cited by counsel, presented no such question as that involved in this case. The instrument was different in its provisions, and the object of the suit was to set aside conveyances made by the trustee under the power contained in the instrument, and for an account and redemption.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.